Calendar

April 2008
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  


Categories:

Archives:

Meta:

FAQs - Licensing Intellectual Property (IP)

April 29th, 2008 by admin

Licensing is a key business strategy. It’s a way to maximize the earnings from inventions and creative works, which are called intellectual property or “IP.”.

What is licensing?

Licensing is when you grant some rights to intellectucal property “IP” that you own. It is really a partnership of mutual cooperation between the licensor, who owns the IP, and the licensee, who is given the right to use it for certain purposes.

Question: What are royalties?

Royalties are a way of calculating compensation for use of intellectual property. The licensee is granted the right to use it for a royalty. Royalties are usually based on a percentage of the revenues that are generated. For instance, if I license my course to a company and say, “For every subsequent use of this course, I get 5% of the revenue,” that’s the royalty 5% of the revenue would be the royalty/payment that I would receive.

Question: Are there rules of thumb for royalty amounts?

Figuring out what royalty to ask for is always a challenge. As sort of a really rough rule of thumb, the allocation of the revenue generated can be 25% for the licensor and 75% for the licensee. This is because the licensee is usually doing all the sales and marketing related to generating revenue. It varies greatly from industry to industry.

Question: What are some examples of the types of works that can be licensed?

Many types of IP can be licensed. For example, copyright-protected works, trademarks, and patented inventions can be licensed. Materials and know-how may be licensed and generate additional income. Other examples include images, photographs, music, a recording - on any kind of media.

It’s very difficult to license something that has not been reduced to writing or some kind of tangible form. Just trying to license “know-how,” for instance, is very difficult. Someone could have a lot of expertise, but unless they turn it into something concrete or tangible, it’s difficult to license it.

Question: What are the pitfalls of licensing?

A classic pitfall is that the licensee does not pay royalties. The licensor gives rights to a licensee and the licensee doesn’t do anything with them. So the licensor’s IP rights are tied up in the license agreement, but the licensor isn’t getting any money for the IP. I recommend that a licensee be required to pay at least a “minimum” royalty or forfeit the license. That way, the licensor is guaranteed a certain level of revenue. That’s also motivating for licensees because they’re going to have to pay that money in order to keep the license, so they’re going to focus on using your IP.

Another pitfall is granting an exclusive license, or giving away way too many rights. The scope of the license grant is extremely important. For example, one situation that I’m familiar with involved a patent for a chemical process. It was licensed to a very large pharmaceutical company. But in that license, we were very careful to limit it to medical applications. We turned around two years later and licensed that same patent to a paint company. Had we granted all the rights in the first license, we wouldn’t have been able to do the second licensing agreement, which was a very different market and a very different application.

Question: What if I want to use someone else’s work?

Using someone else’s work is sometimes called “licensing in.” That’s a very good business strategy as well. Why recreate the wheel if you can use materials that are out there or content that’s already been created? Usually, what I suggest is that you approach the owner of the IP and say, “I’d like permission to use some of your materials,” and you negotiate an agreement.

It’s OK to use other people’s works (without payment) if the work is in the public domain or if the use is considered to be within the “fair use doctrine.” (See enews archives for further discussion).

Question: What if someone copies my work?

Registering copyrights is an important step. If an infringement occurs after the copyright is registered, you can recover statutory damages per infringement and attorney fees. If an infringement occurs prior to registration, you can only recover actual damages, which are extremely difficult to prove.

Question: What is a territory?

Licensors try to specify territories for authorized use. Say, for instance, you have a way to fix cars and you were going to deliver a training program and it required on-site training to show people how to do this particular type of repair - fix the paint or fix the dents. That’s a service that would probably be delivered in person, so it makes sense to carve that up geographically.

But, if you market on the Internet, it’s really hard to specify a geographic territory. For example, if you’re developing an e-learning kind of program and it is going to be marketed over the Internet, then it’s very difficult to restrict geographies, just because you could have potential customers coming from anywhere in the world.

In conclusion, these are just a few of the frequently asked questions about licensing. Licensing is a great way to generate revenue from IP. Is licensing a strategy that you want to explore for your business?

Jean Sifleet is a practical and experienced business attorney whose career spans many years in large multi-national corporations and includes three successful entrepreneurial ventures. Jean has extensive experience in dealing with intellectual property matters in the large and small companies and as a small business owner. She has authored numerous books and publications on avoiding legal pitfalls in doing business. This article is excerpted from her new book, Advantage IP - Profit from Your Great Ideas (Infinity 2005). For more information, Jean’s website is http://www.smartfast.com.

Posted in Lawyers Portal | Comments Off

Choose An Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Today

April 29th, 2008 by admin

Sometimes it seems that everywhere you look right now, you see ads for home loans with incredibly low rates. It’s hard not to ask - are these ads for real?

The answer is - yes, these ads are real, and they’re for adjustable-rate mortgages. Generally, though, the special offer being advertised is only for a short period of time. After that, the loan reverts to the standard interest rate. So once your low interest period ends, you can almost guarantee that your loan rate will rise. Depending on the way your loan is structured, that will more than likely mean a rise in your repayment, too.

While it may be nice to have a period of time where you loan repayment is low, the reality is that at the end of the low rate period it’s going to rise, perhaps substantially, and you have no way of knowing in advance exactly what your new repayment is going to be. While many people are able to cope with this level of uncertainty, for others it can be very worrying, as their incomes are limited. It’s often good to start making monthly repayments equivalent to what you’d be paying under the standard interest rate, even if you’re still in the low rate period of your adjustable-rate mortgage. Paying more can get you into the habit, so you can budget accordingly, and it means you can pay a lot more off the loan early and save yourselves a lot over the life of the loan.

In some instances, lenders have already realized that the uncertainty of adjustable-rate mortgages can be a problem for some families. As a result, some lenders include a clause that limits the size of any interest rate increase, so at least your possible future payment will be capped. But again, this capped period is only going to be for a set period, say 5 years. At some point, you’re going to have to pay the full rate.

Basically, whether or not you choose and adjustable-rate mortgage comes down to your personal financial situation. If you know you can comfortably make the initially payments, and can still make payments even after a substantial rate increase, say 2%, then an adjustable-rate mortgage is probably the best way to go. If, however, your income is fixed and the mortgage payment, though affordable, would become a real problem after a substantial rate rise, then a fixed rate or interest only loan is probably a better option.

Adjustable-rate mortgages usually have a lower interest rate than most fixed rate loans. So they can be more affordable initially. This may also mean that you can qualify for a larger loan. Also, some lenders will consider extending the period of a loan if rates rise substantially and you find yourself in difficulties. So your 20 year mortgage may become 22 years. Of course, this is only likely to happen if you’re up to date with your payments.

Analysis of bank rates over an extended period of time has shown that adjustable-rate mortgages are also a lot more likely to be cheaper than fixed rate loans most of the time. So what you sacrifice in payment certainty, you gain in cheaper rates - most of the time.

So before applying for an adjustable-rate mortgage, take some time to think about the following questions. Knowing the answers will make it much easier to decide if an adjustable-rate mortgage is right for you.

- Is it likely that my income will rise in the foreseeable future? Or will my partner soon be returning to paid work?

- Am I likely to need to borrow other substantial sums shortly, for example to purchase a car or for school tuition?

- Do I expect to sell this home in a short period of time?

Once you have the answers, talk to a lender or a mortgage broker about your situation, and they can help you decide if an adjustable-rate mortgage is right for you.

There’s lots more helpful home loan and adjustable-rate mortgage information at Home Loan Zone Central

Posted in Real Estate Info | Comments Off